My Essay on Gun Control for my English Class, karen alyse - unconditionally me, control gun essay.3/29/2017 As such an important issue, there is a myriad of groups involved in the debate. It is not simply one of pro-gun/anti-gun but rather is one that transcends the usual pro and con debate to become a national issue on a number of levels and approaches, three in specific, all with different interests and views. These approaches include the political approach the social approach and the criminality approach. So who are the gun control laws taking the guns away from? It may be said that if criminals know their victims are unarmed they are less likely to be afraid of committing a criminal act against them. In Canada and England where there is a virtual ban on guns the burglary rate involving guns (known as a “hot burglary) is nearly 50 percent compared to 13 percent in America (Poe). Of course gun control advocates may disagree with the notion that putting guns back into the hands of citizens would halt the majority of crimes. Kristen Rand, legislative director of the Violence Policy Center says that, “Unrealistic scenarios in which criminals meekly surrender at the mere sight of a handgun shouldn’t be our guide. Real life is different.” Clearly the issue over whether gun control laws hurt or help the people they are trying to protect will be met with endless debate. So why is gun control such a hot debate? Perhaps to answer this question it would be important to look at some key statistics concerning handguns in our society. In this nation, where nearly half of all US households own at least one gun, nearly 30,000 people die from a gunshot each year (Dahl). From this alone it is no wonder gun control is such an important issue, however as bad as this may seem online education programs, the number of firearm related incidents have decreased over the years. In the early 1990’s the number of people killed or wounded by firearms soared. Since 1993 however the US has seen a steady drop in deaths due to firearm (The Lancet). Fatal firearms accidents have declined as well, nearly 40 percent in the last decade, and are now at the lowest levels ever recorded (Poe). So why the sudden drop? Antigun advocates would like to attribute this to an increase in gun control laws while pro gun advocates point to a decrease in unemployment rates along with other social factors. The political approach on gun control deals with the issue of laws and political organizations that surround the debate. The government is where the critical laws are made concerning gun control, which in turn effect the entire country, and therefore is important to look at as a key player in the debate. So who is most responsible for the enactment of gun control laws? The answer is each side, political, social and criminal. The connection can be easily made between the three. It is the criminal aspects of gun control, which cause significant social strife and in turn political action. The net effect is that all three together are working to either prevent or promote the enactment of gun control laws, laws that have a significant impact to every person on every side of the debate. An even greater shortcoming of the Brady Bill is that it only affects legal transactions. By definition, a criminal is someone who breaks the law. Criminals have many ways to obtain weapons without going through the process mandated by the Brady Bill. Two obvious examples are theft and black market purchases. According to studies "only one firearm of every six used in a crime is obtained legally" (Thomas 277) . Since the passage of the Brady Bill, only four felons have been apprehended trying to purchase a firearm (NRA, "Grassfire") . When I asked Steve Rusiecki for a policeman's opinion of the Brady Bill, he replied: "I think it is an emotional attempt at crime reduction rather than one based on legitimate facts" (6) . In view of the facts presented, it is obvious that the Brady Bill is not an effective crime prevention tool. Firearms are also used in competitive sports. The Olympic Games include competitions with pistols, rifles, and shotguns. Shooting is also part of the biathlon and has been part of the Olympic pentathlon since 1912 ("Pentathlon") . There are also many competitions throughout the country in bull's eye, bench rest, silhouette, practical pistol, trap and skeet, and other shooting sports. Men, women why i can't do my homework, older children, and even individuals with certain disabilities can enjoy these sports since shooting does not require much agility or physical strength. The Brady Bill and the "Assault Weapon" ban in last year's Crime Bill are examples of bad legislation, but some good firearms-related legislation was also passed last year. The Arizona Legislature recognized the benefits of firearms to our society and passed a law which enables many Arizona residents to obtain a permit to carry a concealed weapon. There are restrictions in place to ensure that only responsible citizens are issued a permit. These restrictions cover age, criminal record, and mental competency. Applicants for this permit must pass a sixteen-hour training course. In addition, the applicant must send a copy of their fingerprints to the Department of Public Safety to be used to help them conduct a background check (Korwin 150-151) . Society does benefit from firearms in the hands of responsible citizens. It is our responsibility to use them properly and safely. The Founding Fathers of our country won our freedom with firearms. After we won our independence the Founding Fathers included the right to keep and bear arms in the Constitution to ensure that the freedom they fought for would last. Throughout the history of this country firearms have been used to defend that freedom from both foreign aggressors and from violent criminal aggressors. Americans own and use firearms for many reasons, such as; hunting, organized sports competitions, informal recreational uses, and for protection. Some legislation has been passed recently which restricts our firearms rights, and the shortcomings of these laws have been exposed. Fortunately, there has also been good legislation passed, like Arizona's Concealed Carry Law, which give residents of this state a better chance to defend themselves against violent crime. NRA Institute for Legislative Action. "NRA Firearms Fact Card - 1995." Computer file downloaded from GUN-TALK BBS. "Survival of the Armed: Hearing Reviews Gun Laws." The Arizona Republic April 1, 1995: A4. To begin with, a definition of a "responsible citizen" is in order. The definition used in this paper was provided by Steve Rusiecki, a local police officer. When asked what makes someone a responsible citizen in regard to firearms ownership, Mr. Rusiecki replied, "The citizen must be law-abiding, with no felony record, must not abuse alcohol or drugs, must not be mentally ill, must not have renounced U.S. citizenship, must not have been dishonorably discharged from the military, and must be in the U.S. legally" (10) . This definition combines elements from the Federal Gun Control Act of 1968, and Arizona's concealed carry law. The Brady Bill is not effective in fighting crime, but it does affect crime victims. The five-day waiting period during which the police conduct the background check is also supposed to serve as a "cooling off" period to prevent crimes of passion. Fortunately, this five-day wait is waived in states like Virginia which have an instant background check system in place. The following article is an example of how waiting periods affect crime victims: Even without formal competition, shooting can be enjoyed as a hobby. Recreational shooting may involve paper targets, tin cans, or other suitable targets. This hobby can be enjoyed at indoor target ranges, but is usually practiced outdoors. In fact, shooting can often be combined with other enjoyable outdoor activities, such as hiking, camping, and sight seeing. Francis, Samuel. "The Truth and Tripe About Concealed Weapon Carry Laws." The Mohave Valley Daily News . 16 March 1995: A4. Statistics show that people who are attacked by a criminal are safer if they use a weapon to resist their attacker than if they do not resist. In addition, those who resist with a gun are less likely to be injured than those who use a less effective weapon, such as a knife (Quigley 14) . Resisting crime with a gun does not always mean shooting the criminal. Statistics show that in true life instances of self-defense with firearms, firing the gun was necessary only one third to one half of the time (13) , the rest of the time the mere presence of a gun was enough to scare away the attacker. Hardy is an Arizona attorney and a Second Amendment scholar and writer. Once you’re ready to start writing, check out these sample essays on gun control for some ideas on how to put your paper together. Hardy fears that the gun control lobby is on a crusade to wipe out individual gun ownership altogether. LePore, J. (2012, April 23). Battleground America. The New Yorker. Retrieved from http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2012/04/23/battleground-america Barrett, Paul M. “Gun Control and the Constitution: Should We Amend the Second Amendment?” Bloomberg Businessweek. Bloomberg, 20 Feb. 2014. Web. 10 July 2016. You can cite these or any of thousands of other gun control articles to buttress your argument. (Read 5 Best Resources to Help With Writing a Research Paper if you need assistance researching more scholarly sources.) Hamblin is a frequent contributor and senior editor at TheAtlantic . This article discusses what is perhaps the greatest source of contention in the entire debate: the Second Amendment’s wording. Davidson examples of written public speech, Jacob. “‘A Criminologist’s Case Against Gun Control.” Time. 1 Dec. 2015, time.com/4100408/a-criminologists-case-against-gun-control. Accessed 10 July 2016. Hardy, D. T. (2013, July 18). Why gun owners are right to fight against gun control. Reason.com. Retrieved from http://www.reason.com/archives/ 2013/07/18/why-second-amendment-supporters-are-righ LePore, Jill. “Battleground America.” The New Yorker. The New Yorker essays story, 23 Apr. 2012. Web. 10 July 2016. This well-researched article was written in the aftermath of the Trayvon Martin shooting. It covers three main areas: Bovy tackles the gun issue by arguing that the debate should not be about closing loopholes in gun control. She doesn’t argue that specific types of guns should be banned, but argues that all guns should be banned. The author quotes former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, who advocates changing the Second Amendment’s confusing language to clarify that it only applies to those serving in a militia. 5) Interesting premise…but just an opinion. Hamblin, James. “Why We Can’t Talk About Gun Control.” The Atlantic. The Atlantic Monthly Group, 29 June 2014. Web. 10 July 2016. No matter what side you argue, this post will point you to some credible sources for your argumentative gun control essay. Davidson, Jacob. “‘A Criminologist’s Case Against Gun Control.” Time.com. Time Inc. 1 Dec. 2015. Web. 10 July 2016. Here’s a sixth: Investigate the racist roots of gun control. The 8th edition of MLA also suggests that you include the URL in each entry. Including the date you accessed an online source is now optional. I’ve included both pieces of information in my examples. Gun control is a hot button issue, especially in the wake of so many recent, tragic mass shootings. It is also a polarizing issue, which means that it tends to divide people. The articles and videos are too numerous to cite in this post, but I’ve included one sample to help illustrate how you might cite these resources. This article includes an interview with James Jacobs, director of the Center for Research in Crime and Justice at New York University School of Law. He is also a professor of constitutional law and the author of Can Gun Control Work? This article, published by the The New York Times. provides broad definitions of gun control, includes arguments both for and against gun control essay about service to community, and even speculates as to why it’s so difficult to solve the debate. Wilson, James Q. “Gun Control Isn’t the Answer.” Los Angeles Times, 20 Apr. 2007, www.latimes.com/la-oe-wilson20apr20-story.html. Accessed 10 July 2016. LePore is a frequent contributor to TheNew Yorker, as well as many other national news magazines. wow the potato is strong with you, the most violent states in the country are california, new york illinois college research paper topics for english, and DC, all have some of the most restrictive laws in the country, and are suprisingly full of “tolerant liberals” Times Editorial Board. “California’s Proposed Gun Laws Won’t Change Our Culture of Violence, but They Will Make Us Safer.” LATimes.com. Los Angeles Times Media Group, 22 Apr. 2016. Web. 10 July 2016. Davidson, J. (2015, December 1). A criminologist’s case against gun control. Time. Retrieved from http://www.time.com/4100408/a-criminologists-case-against-gun-control All of these questions would make great material for a paper on the topic. Stuck on Your Gun Control Essay? 4) Yep. Gun control…or the possibility of gun control is costing some states long held jobs. And some state politicians their jobs help writing book reports, too. Barrett, P. M. (2014, February 10). Gun control and the Constitution: Should we amend the Second Amendment? Bloomberg Businessweek. Retrieved from http://www. bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-02-20/gun-control-and-the-constitution-should-we-amend-the-second-amendment Simon, Mallory and Ray Sanchez. “U.S. Gun Violence: The Story in Charts and Graphs.” CNN, 4 Dec. 2015, cnn.com/2015/12/04/us/gun-violence-graphics/index.html. Accessed 10 July 2016. Perez-Pena, Richard. “Gun Control Explained.” NYTimes.com. The New York Times Company, 7 Oct. 2015. Web. 10 July 2016. Bovey, Phoebe, M. “It’s Time to Ban Guns. Yes, All of Them.” New Republic. 10 Dec. 2015, newrepublic.com/article/125498/its-time-ban-guns-yes-them. Accessed 10 July 2016. Here, the author explains his opinion by framing it in his own experiences. He states that he lost his job when he published a column arguing that it’s possible to regulate guns without infringing on individuals’ rights. 3) David Hardy is absolutely right. He’s the only one that backs up his arguments with evidence. Get Teen Ink’s 48-page monthly print edition. Written by teens since 1989. The final reason that being pro-gun control is effective is the simple fact of safety. Not only is it unsafe for just anyone to have a gun, it is also unsafe for everyone (trained or not) to walk around, armed, at all times. There have been serious incidents where guns were unintentionally fired, but still caused a big problem when they did. In a recent study they have found that democracy essay, “rather than being used for self-defense, guns in the home are 22 times more likely to be involved in accidental shootings, homicides, or suicide attempts. For every one time a gun in the home was used in a self-defense or legally justifiable shooting, there were 4 unintentional shootings, 7 criminal assaults or homicides, and 11 attempted or completed suicides” (Kellermann how to write a review about a book, A. L. "Injuries and Deaths due to Firearms in the Home"). Having guns available to anyone in a home at any time can lead to serious problems, injuries or deaths. Many cases have also come up where a teenager in the house takes the family gun to school or winds up shooting his own family members. Accident Analysis and Prevention states, “for kids ages 5 to 14 cover letter and cv format, the mortality rate is 14 times higher in high gun ownership states than low gun ownership states. For infants and toddlers, ages 0 to 4, the mortality rate is 17 times higher in high gun ownership states than low gun ownership states.” (Matthew Miller, Deborah Azrael& David Hemenway). Taking guns out of the hands of all people will decrease risks of any non-necessary problems occurring. The biggest claim that people who are anti-gun control have is that it is taking away their rights to bear arms as a part of the second amendment. ("Against Gun Control." ThinkQuest. Oracle Foundation.) Yes, this is true, but not only is this claim unfair but it is exactly what gun laws will change. While the people allowed to carry guns feel safer, now the people who don’t want to be around guns feel unsafe. It almost acts as a lose-lose situation but by eliminating the fear of injury or death would be more worth it in the long run. Why should someone fear a gun when if no one had or could carry them, everybody would be safe? The first reason gun control should be in existance is because without law saying otherwise, a gun can be in anyone’s hands. If stricter gun laws were made, more lives would be saved. Not only should there be a standard background check, but I am also a strong supporter of medical background checks. The Council on Foreign Relations states that, “A so-called "gun show loophole," codified in the Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1986, effectively allows anyone, including convicted felons, to purchase firearms without a background check.” ("U.S. Gun Policy: Global Comparisons”). If there are no boundaries to who can have a gun what are good research topics for education, anyone and everyone is put at risk. Once it is legal for anyone to have a gun, nothing can be done about it. Image Credit: Elizabeth H., Hahaha I’m not one of those girls. But I know what I’m talking about and I know what the 2nd amendment means. I know I’m right. I don’t have to think I’m right nor did you prove me wrong. I have studied this topic quite extensively and discussed it with many people. I know that I’m right. You really didn’t understand what I said and obviously didn’t catch any of my previous comment other than the last part. I really hope you learn that gun control is bad and realize that you can’t just attack someone when they are clearly well versed in the topic they are writing about. Thanks have a great day. I really don’t have the patience or need to deal with ignorance anymore. I’m Audi. THANK U SO MUCH. ur essay helped me alot ? ? ? That is not true. That was when the militia wasn’t solely controlled by the government. People actually had a say in what the militia did. Now we have no say and that is what the 2nd amendment is meant to protect against. The army is not well regulated as the president is the only person that they take orders from. Think about it this way: The president brings gun control into being and everyone has to give up their guns, might seem harmless, oh yes. But how did every genocide ever in history start? Oh yeah…by their guns and weapons being taken away. This causes the people to be defenseless and all of a sudden our government is overbearing. We were meant to be able to protect ourselves from the government should it ever become corrupt and THAT is why gun control is bad. This has nothing to do with what you think the second amendment means, but everything to do with the fact that if our government is not well-regulated, we could be a part of another genocide. No thank you. Gun control is no bueno. I didn’t leave out the important stuff. It is all there. You just read it wrong and interpreted it wrong. Gun Control – Should We, Or Should We Not?
0 Commentaires
Laisser une réponse. |